摘要

兴献王朱祐杬死后的身份被其子朱厚熜不断重塑,这直接影响到朱祐杬实录名称的变化.初,兴献王升格为"兴献帝",后又在帝上加"皇"字,同时送上一个新的谥号"恭穆".最后,又追上庙号"睿宗".早在上庙号之前,世宗就迫不及待地为乃父修纂实录,导致该实录与明代所有实录称"祖""宗"不同,而仅为称"谥"实录,即"恭穆献皇帝实录".然而,后世并未严格遵循始修时所用的名称,而是各有叫法,且多有感情偏向:称全称"恭穆献皇帝实录"比较正式;称"献皇帝实录"比较普遍;称"献皇实录"比较亲切;称"献帝实录"则相对冷漠;称"睿宗实录",则是事后追称,是按实录称"祖""宗"之例的通俗称呼.这种现象,反映了该实录性质的特殊性和认知的复杂性,以及政治环境变化所导致的史书多名并称的状态.; The posthumous status of Zhu Youyuan,Prince Xingxian,was continuously reshaped by his son Zhu Houcong,which directly affected the changes in the title of Zhu Youyuan's Veritable Records.Initially,Prince Xing was elevated to the title of"Emperor Xingxian";subsequently,the character"Huang"(Imperial)was appended to his imperial title,along with the new post-humous epithet"Gongmu".Eventually,he was conferred the temple name"Ruizong".Even before the temple name was granted,Emperor Shizong hastily ordered the compilation of the Veritable Records for his father.As a result,unlike all other Veritable Re-cords of the Ming Dynasty,which were named after temple names with"Zu"or"Zong,"this Veritable Records was titled solely by its posthumous title:Veritable Records of Emperor Gongmu Xian.Later generations,however,did not strictly observe its orig-inal compiled title;instead,various forms were used,often reflecting different attitudes:the full title Veritable Records of Emper-or Gongmu Xian is formal;Veritable Records of Emperor Xian is common;Veritable Records of Xian,the Emperor is intimate;Veritable Records of the Emperor Xian is relatively impersonal;and Veritable Records of Ruizong is a retrospective designation,following the common practice of naming Veritable Records after the temple names.This phenomenon reflects the unique nature and complicated perception of this Veritable Records,as well as the coexistence of multiple historical titles caused by shifts in the political environment.

关键词