摘要

"二重证据法"的内涵有一个逐渐丰富的过程,具体表现为证据"重"数增多、运用历史时段延长并挪移、应用研究领域扩大,具体"证据"所指更改替换.从本质上看,"二重证据法"本意与古代金石证史更为接近,注重出土的文字材料与传世文献互证,后随着史学实践的深入,其"地下材料"的内涵才由文字扩展到实物,体现出当时史学与考古学结合的自然趋势,但也存有偏重史学一方、未能妥善处理二者关系的潜在隐患."二重证据法"内涵的演变,显示了治史方法的与时俱新,也折射出近现代史学的转型与变革."二重证据法"备受关注,既因它触及史料运用这一历史研究的核心问题,也得益于新史料的发现、科学方法论思潮的推动、王国维承前启后的学术地位,以及对疑古思潮的回应等多重因素.; The connotation of the"Dual Evidence Method"has undergone a gradual enrichment process,specifically charac-terized by an increase in the types of evidence used,an extension and shift of historical periods it applies to,an expansion of its fields of applied research,and the modification or substitution of the specific types of"evidence"referred to.Essentially,the orig-inal concept of the"Dual Evidence Method"was closer to the traditional practice of the epigraphic and artifact-based verification of history,emphasizing the mutual corroboration between unearthed written materials and transmitted texts.As historical research practices deepened,the connotation of"unearthed materials"expanded from written texts to physical artifacts,reflecting the natural trend of integrating history and archaeology during that period.However,this expansion carries the potential risk of over-emphasizing the historiographical side and inadequately addressing the relationship between the two.The evolution of the conno-tation of the"Dual Evidence Method"illustrates the advancement of historical research methods in response to the times and reflects the transformation and reform of modern and contemporary historiography.This method has garnered significant attention not only because it addresses the core issue of historical research-the application of historical sources-but also due to multiple factors including the dis-covery of new historical materials,the impetus of the trend of scientific methodological thought,Wang Guowei's pivotal academic role in bridging the past and future,and its role as a response to the skepticism regarding ancient history.

关键词